Login

Amy D. Hogue

Document Title Statutes Cases
DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101 ; 9 U.S.C. §3; California. Lab. Code § 2699(c); Civ. Code § 1550; Civ. Code § 1556; Federal Arbitration Act; Labor Code section 216; National Labor Relations Act ; Private Attorneys General Act; WARN Act Aanderud v. Super. Ct., 13 Cal. App. 5th 880, (2017); AT & T Techs., Inc. v. Commc’ns Workers of Am., 475 U.S. 643; Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440; Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc., 539 U.S. 52, 56 (2003) (; EEOC v. Waffle House, 534 U.S. 279, 289 (2002); Esparza v. KS Indus., L.P., 13 Cal. App. 5th 1228, 1234 (2017); Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 524, (2019) (; Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal. 4th 348; Mohamed v. Uber Techs., Inc., 848 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 2016); O’Connor v. Uber Techs., 904 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2018); Omar v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 118 Cal. App. 4th 955 (2004); Pinnacle Museum Tower Assn. v. Pinnacle Market Development, 55 Cal. 4th 223; Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63, (2010); Rodriguez v. Am. Techs, Inc., 136 Cal. App. 4th 1110; Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale’s, 5 Cal. App. 5th 665, 673 (2016); Vianna v. Doctors’ Mgmt. Co., 27 Cal. App. 4th 1186 (1994)
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION California Code of Civil Procedure sections 1281; Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. section 1, et seq.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Cal. Civ. Code§ 1550.; Cal. R. Ct., Rule 3.1330.; California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 ("PAGA"); PAGA, California Labor Code § 2698 et seq. AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communication Workers of America (1986) 47 5 U.S. 643; Betancourt v. Prudential Overall Supply (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 439; Esparza v. KS Industries, L.P. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 1228; Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc. (2019) 139 S.Ct. 524; Hernandez v. Ross Stores, Inc. (2016) 7 Cal.App.5th 171; Hotels Nevada v. L.A. Pacific Center, Inc. (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 754; Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348; Mitri v. Arnel Management Co. (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 1164; Reyes v. Macy's, Inc. (2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 1119; Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Group, Inc. (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 836; Williams v. Superior Court (2015) 237 Cal.App.4th 642
PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Cal. Civ. Code § 1550; Cal. Civ. Code § 1668; Cal. Civ. Code § 3513 ; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1330; Code Civ. Proc. § 340 ; Code Civ. Proc., § 1280; Code Civ. Proc., § 1290.2; Labor Code § 216; Labor Code § 2698 ; Labor Code § 2699.3 Betancourt v. Prudential Overall Supply (2017) 9 CA5th 439; Betancourt v. Prudential Overall Supply (2017) 9 Cal. App. 5th 439; Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 28 Cal.App. 5th 824 ; Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. Superior Court (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 365; Conrad v. Bank of America ( 1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 133; County of Solano v. Lionsgate Corp. (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 741; EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc. (2002) 534 U.S. 279; Engineers & Architects Assn. v. Community Development Dept. (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 644; Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis (2018) 138 S. Ct. 1612; Estrada v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 154 Cal. App. 4th 1; Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. (1975) 14 Cal.3d 473; Hernandez v. Ross Stores, Inc. (2016) 7 Cal.App.5th 171; Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348; Omar v. Ralphs Grocery Co. (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 955; Pinnacle Museum Tower Assn. v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLC (2012) 55 Cal.4th 223; Securitas Services USA, Inc. v. Superior Court, 234 Cal. App. 4th 1109; Stolt–Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int'l Corp. (2010) 559 U.S. 662; Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's, Inc. (2016) 5 CA5th 665; Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's, Inc. (2016) 5 Cal.App.5th 665; Williams v. Superior Court (2015) 237 Cal. App. 4th 642; ZB, N.A. v. Super. Ct., 8 Cal.5th 175 (Cal. 2019)
PROOF OF SERVICE
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Cal. Labor Code § 2699(c) Betancourt v. Prudential Overall Supply, 9 Cal. App. 5th 439; Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court, 4 Cal. 5th 903 (2018); Futrell v. Payday California, Inc., 190 Cal. App. 4th 1419; Hernandez v. Ross Stores, Inc., 7 Cal. App. 5th 171 (2016); Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal. 4th 348; Olnick v. BMG Entertainment, 138 Cal. App. 4th 1286; Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63; Richemond v. Uber Techs., 263 F. Supp. 3d 1312 ; S.G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Dept. of Industrial Rel., 48 Cal. 3d 341 (1989); Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale’s Inc., 5 Cal. App. 5th 665 (2016); ZB, N.A. v. Superior Court of San Diego County, 8 Cal. 5th 175 (2019)
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Code of Civil Procedure section 437; Evidence Code sections 452 Rashid Alatraqchi v. Uber Technologies, Inc., DLSE Case No. 11-42020 CT dated August 1, 2012; Rodas v. Spiegel, 87 Cal.App.4th 513, 518 (2000)
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION California Rule of Court 3.1306(c); Code of Civil Procedure section 437; Evidence Code section 453; Evidence Code sections 452 De Moya v. Rev.com, Inc. pending before the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, Case No. D075268; Provost v. YourMechanic, Inc. pending before the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, Case No. D076569
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION California Evid C § 452(d); California Rule of Court 3.1306(c)
SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION